This site is intended for US healthcare professionals only.
EFFICACY
Optune Pax with gem/nab-pac vs gem/nab-pac alone extended overall survival, delayed pain progression, and preserved quality of life longer.
Overall survival
Significantly extended overall survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer1,2
Overall survival in the ITT population
68.1% 1-YEAR SURVIVAL RATE
with Optune Pax with gem/nab-pac (95% CI: 62.0, 73.5) vs 60.2% with gem/nab-pac (95% CI: 54.2, 65.7)
Improved overall survival among patients who started and stayed on therapy for at least 1 full cycle1
Overall survival in the mPP population
75.2% 1-YEAR SURVIVAL RATE
with Optune Pax with gem/nab-pac (95% CI: 68.5, 80.7) vs 65.9% with gem/nab-pac (95% CI: 59.0, 72.0)
mPP population: Patients who received at least 1 cycle of gem/nab-pac (both arms) and, for the Optune Pax with gem/nab-pac arm, also received at least 4 weeks (28 days) of treatment with Optune Pax.
Pain endpoints
Delayed pain progression1,2
Time to pain progression
Patients treated with Optune Pax with gem/nab-pac lived a
MEDIAN OF 6.1 MONTHS LONGER, WITHOUT PAIN PROGRESSION1
Pain progression evaluated based on VAS score for pain
- A common tool to measure overall pain intensity on a 0 to 100 scale3
- Measured from randomization until a ≥20- point increase from baseline, a threshold representing the minimal clinically important difference for a meaningful change in pain intensity1
- Analysis based on patient-reported outcomes1
Patients who experienced local disease progression were no longer followed for pain progression (67/285 patients in the Optune Pax with gem/nab-pac arm and 56/286 patients in the gem/nab-pac arm). Because a large number of patients stopped pain assessments after local disease progression, this censoring approach can lead to an overestimation.1
Delayed additional pain measures1,4
Additional predefined secondary pain endpoints
In a post hoc analysis, a trend of longer time to first use of opioid pain medication was observed in the Optune Pax with gem/nab-pac arm, compared to the gem/nab-pac arm1*
*Note that overall opioid medication exposure (in terms of types of frequency of exposure) was similar between the study arms.1
Patients who experienced local disease progression were not evaluated for quality of life endpoints following progression. Consequently, these results do not capture the quality of life status of patients with local disease progression. Notably, analyses that accounted for local disease progression showed consistent trends across the same QoL domains.1
Quality of life
Preserved quality of life longer1,4
Time to deterioration in global health status (GHS)
1.4 MONTH LONGER MEDIAN TIME TO DETERIORATION IN GLOBAL HEALTH STATUS
with Optune Pax with gem/nab-pac 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.7, 9.4) vs 5.7 months gem/nab-pac (95% CI: 4.1, 7.4)4*
- Time to deterioration in GHS was measured from randomization until the first deterioration in GHS score of ≥10 points (on a 0 to 100 scale) based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire4
- Analysis based on patient-reported outcomes4
Extended time without deterioration in multiple digestive symptoms4
Time to deterioration in digestive symptoms
- Time to deterioration in digestive symptoms was measured from randomization until the first deterioration in symptom score of ≥10 points (on a 0 to 100 scale) based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and PAN26 addendum4
- Analysis based on patient-reported outcomes4
Patients who experienced local disease progression were not evaluated for quality of life endpoints following progression. Consequently, these results do not capture the quality of life status of patients with local disease progression. Notably, analyses that accounted for local disease progression showed consistent trends across the same QoL domains.1
The safety of Optune Pax was studied in the PANOVA-3 trial1
AE=adverse event; CI=confidence interval; EORTC QLQ-C30=European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30; gem/nab-pac=gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel; HR=hazard ratio; ITT=intent-to-treat; mPP=modified per protocol; mOS=median overall survival; PAN26=pancreatic cancer–specific addendum to EORTC QLQ questionnaire; QoL=quality of life; TTD=time to deterioration; TTPP=time to pain progression; VAS=Visual Analog Scale.
References: 1. Optune Pax for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC). Physician Instructions for Use. Novocure; 2026 2. Babiker HM, Picozzi V, Chandana SR, et al. Tumor treating fields with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: randomized, open-label, pivotal phase III PANOVA-3 study. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(21):2350-2360. doi:10.1200/JCO-25-00746 3. Åström M, Thet Lwin ZM, Teni FS, Burström K, Berg J. Use of the visual analogue scale for health state valuation: a scoping review. Qual Life Res. 2023;32(10):2719-2729. doi:10.1007/s11136-023-03411-3 4. Macarulla T, Picozzi V, Chandana S, et al. PANOVA-3: pain and quality of life outcomes with tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC). 2025 ESMO Gastrointestinal Cancers Annual Congress; July 2–5, 2025; Barcelona, Spain.